Search for: "United States v. Thacker" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Post-Conviction Relief; Section 14 of the Curtis Act) United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
United States, the court analogizes this case to Legal Assistance for Vietnamese Asylum Seekers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
Case date: 24 January 2023 Case number: No. 21-1823 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
In Part III, I analyzed the concurring opinions of Judges Keenan, Thacker, and Wynn. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” This blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Thacker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by Amy Howe
Hyatt (Jan. 9): Whether the Supreme Court should overrule its earlier case allowing one state to be sued in another state’s courts without its consent Thacker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Department of State; Assistant Secretary of State, Educational and Cultural Affairs. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am by Peter Margulies
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]