Search for: "United States v. The Commissioner" Results 81 - 100 of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 12:57 am by Paul Caron
Commissioner [625 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2010)] Consumer Credit Protection Act's Restriction on Garnishment Inapplicable to Tax Debt: United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Marion County, the Supreme Court dismissed a constitutional challenge to an Indiana law requiring all voters who cast a ballot in person to present a photo ID issued by the United States or the State of Indiana. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 3:07 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 1329 (2012): In April of 2010, the United States Tax Court in O’Donnabhain v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Contracting out a negotiating unit's work Vestal Employees Asso., NEA/NY v Vestal CSD, 94 N.Y.2d 409 Management may attempt to “contract out” work claiming that to do so is more efficient or less expensive or because the tasks are “too technical” for its employees to perform. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by SHG
S. 378, 384 (1987);United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
State Auditor John Morrison today filed a "friend of the court" brief in a United States Supreme Court case involving worker rights under group health and disability insurance. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 6:04 am
[www.floridasupport.us]No. 07-7348 IN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EARL WESLEY BERRY, Petitioner V, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections,LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent ofthe Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman,and JOHN DOES 1-50, Respondents ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARITO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OFPETITION FOR A… [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:43 pm by David Lat
Holmes of the United States Tax Court, dissenting in Tigers Eye Trading, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:23 am
The petitioner’s habeas claim was that the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, deprived him of a protected liberty interest under the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution1 by ‘‘falsely’’ classifying him as a sex offender without due process of law. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:14 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE
  That arrest was the starting point of an eight-year legal fight, via the European Court of Human Rights, by Mr Ahmad unsuccessfully to avoid extradition to the United States on terrorism charges. [read post]