Search for: "United States v. Tillman"
Results 1 - 20
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:29 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law) has posted What We Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law) & Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law Houston) have posted Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part IV: The 'Office . . . under the United States' Drafting ConventionSeth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part IV: The “Office . . . under the United States”… [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:45 am
However, a closely related question was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Powell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:50 am
"After Words with Roberta Kaplan: Roberta Kaplan talked about her book Then Comes Marriage: United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
Seth Barrett Tillman (United States District Court, PA) has posted The Puzzle of Hamilton's Federalist No. 77: It Turns Out Hamilton Was Right after All on SSRN. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
Some scholars assume that the President holds an "Office under the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:30 pm
., v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
" Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an "officer of the United States" for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
United States undermines key aspects of Mueller's framework.] [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
SEC (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring); see also United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
Last month, we filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm
“In Trump v. [read post]
