Search for: "United States v. Toys" R" US, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants approached Plaintiff about a possible collaboration to distribute the toy outside of the United States, which Plaintiff declined. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
Toys "R" Us Inc. et al., No. 06-0242, 2009 WL 2055168 (E.D. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
Applicant, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toy figures. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:25 pm
The outcome:Lanard Toys Limited (“Lanard”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granting summary judgment in favor ofDolgencorp LLC, Ja-Ru, Inc., and Toys “R” Us–Delaware,Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Creative expression through the sale of parody-based dog toys has recently caught the attention of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:40 am
The district court granted the motion because the plaintiff's patents did not qualify as patentable subject matter under the machine-or-transformation, which the United States Supreme Court has recently determine remains a useful test in determining patentable subject matter. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 am
The qualification is that “the Lanham Act’s tolerance for similarity between competing marks varies inversely with the fame of the prior mark,” Kenneth Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
Just Toys, Inc., 122 F.3d 1396, 1402 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am
United Trademark Holdings, Inc. filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for use in conjunction with dolls and toy figures. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
The barely one-week old landmark US Supreme Court decision in KSR v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:16 am
” Eurofins, 623 F.3d at 157; Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
A design patent is at issue:Coleman owns United States Design PatentNo. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
Property of Marvel Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:11 am
Bergsman).Examining Attorney Samuel R. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
However, in R. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Toys “R” Us, Inc., 126 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 1997) (Kuwaiti business was party to the arbitration); Ministry of Defense of Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Toys "R" Us, Inc., has interpreted the first sale doctrine to cover both (1) copies manufactured aboard but first sold in the United States and (2) copies manufactured abroad but first sold in the United States with the American copyright owner's permission. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:23 pm
About 2.5 million units were sold in the United States, along with an additional 55,000 in Canada. [read post]
