Search for: "United States v. Trippe" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm by Steve Vladeck
That question, in turn, became the dominant focus of the ten-minute argument by Assistant to the Solicitor General Zachary Tripp on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting Ross and the state. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
Tripp TrappWith that background, the IP High Court of Japan recently issued a Judgment (Stokke v Katoji, Intellectual Property High Court, April 14, 2015, Hei 26 (ne) No. 10063) which recognized the copyright in an industrial design, namely for the TRIPP TRAPP children’s chair (Stokke has known some IP trials and tribulations for the same chair in Europe, see here). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:19 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
We agree that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over the parcels held in trust by the United States and affirm. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am by Jani
In the United States the protection of three-dimensional marks falls under trade dress (defined in 15 USC 1127), and is more mailable than legislation applying purely to registered trademarks. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
 In the United States, there would be little protection against look-alike cantilever chairs if it is plain that what has been emulated is the idea -- which is not protected at all by copyright.Regarding levels of abstraction, should one compare an allegedly infringing use with a trade mark as registered, with the trade mark as used, or on any other basis? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Steven Boutwell
R.S. 38:2212.B(6)(b); Unit prices govern if there is a discrepancy between the base bid total and extended unit pricing. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In construing a constitution or any part of it, a court should look to the law as it existed at the time it was adopted s held in Matrox v United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
Anil Kumar Gupta on the cross pollination of innovation and its promotion (Spicy IP) ICANN renders ‘domain tasting’ unpalatable (Spicy IP)   United Kingdom Drinks giant Diageo and Sainsbury's have reached agreement in their dispute  (IPKat) (IPKat)   Patent litigation costs and SMEs a judge speaks (PatLit)  (PatLit)   United States US General US Industry Campaign: IP needed to address climate change,… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]