Search for: "United States v. Trippe" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2015, 2:30 am by Jani
In the United States the protection of three-dimensional marks falls under trade dress (defined in 15 USC 1127), and is more mailable than legislation applying purely to registered trademarks. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
 In the United States, there would be little protection against look-alike cantilever chairs if it is plain that what has been emulated is the idea -- which is not protected at all by copyright.Regarding levels of abstraction, should one compare an allegedly infringing use with a trade mark as registered, with the trade mark as used, or on any other basis? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Steven Boutwell
R.S. 38:2212.B(6)(b); Unit prices govern if there is a discrepancy between the base bid total and extended unit pricing. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In construing a constitution or any part of it, a court should look to the law as it existed at the time it was adopted s held in Matrox v United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” Our working group includes lawyers throughout the United States and in the United Kingdom who are working across different practice groups and different disciplines to deliver timely and practical solutions to our clients facing exposure to subprime-related claims. [read post]