Search for: "United States v. Truman"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am
” Despite Truman’s argument that his position as commander-in-chief afforded him the power to make all military decisions, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:22 pm
In Truman v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
The specific issue in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Every four years, Americans go to the polls to elect the individual who will serve as our chief executive officer, commander in chief of the armed forces, head of state, and who, since the Truman administration, is known by the acronym, POTUS – President of the United States. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
The Truman Administration laid the dilemma out plainly: “The existence of discrimination against minority groups in the United States has an adverse effect upon our relations with other countries. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
Truman expressly recognized the creation of a “Jewish state” within Israel’s borders. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:49 am
This is not true; an individual suffering from a mental illness can be sentenced to death in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
United States Agency for International Development ... [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:01 am
Robert Jackson, born in 1892, served as United States Solicitor General (1938-1940), United States Attorney General (1940–1941) and an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court (1941–1954). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Probably Russia or China would be delighted to loan President Trump a few billion, but it might not be so good for the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 10:23 am
Second, if NATO invokes Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, it would trigger an international law obligation on the United States to “assist” France by taking “such action as [the United States] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:54 am
United States, the famous wiretapping case. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The contemporaneous legal document most often cited on the legal basis for the war, a 1950 State Department opinion, curiously was edited when published in a way that obscures the timing of Truman’s action in advance of the UNSC. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
