Search for: "United States v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp." Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2006, 5:46 am
The case is Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
It also provides a potential end-run around the Supreme Court's decision in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), which declined to extend Lanham Act protection to removal of the original production company's name when re-distributing a public domain television series. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656, 660 (2d Cir. 1989). [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 5:45 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) was one of the most important decisions for copyright, given its affirmation of the public domain and the right to use public domain works without attribution. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, that origin, in Section 43(a), “refers to the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not to the author of any idea, concept, or communication embodied in those goods. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:29 am by Terry Hart
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 US 23, 34 (2003). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 361 F.3d 312, 318 (6th Cir. 2004) (noting that the standard for originality is quite low and that the “vast majority of works make the grade quite easily”) (quoting Feist, 499 U.S. at 361). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Barry Sookman
 Although not cited in the opinion, an earlier Canadian Internet retranmitter, ICraveTV, was shut down by a District Court in Pennsylvania in the the case Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:28 am by Terry Hart
Twentieth Century Fox Film, which warned against “disregarding the trademark/copyright distinction.” [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Stouffer declined, and National Geographic ended up airing the series in 2012 under the title “Untamed Americas” within the United States, and “Wild America” outside of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 198 F.3d 1104, 1114-16 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring some connection between the goods or services complained of and an actual physical place); Ford v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
” The distinction between “general” and “specific” was considered by the CJEU in the eBay case and subsequently by the High Court in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v British Telecommunications Plc ([2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch)) in which Arnold J held that an order intended to block access by BT’s subscribers to a particular website involved in copyright infringement did not fall foul of Article 15. [read post]