Search for: "United States v. Two Obscene Books" Results 1 - 20 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
“Even though the Comstock law does not ban abortion literally,” Mitchell has explained, “it bans the shipment or receipt of any abortion-related equipment,” and no abortion takes place in the United States without some item sent in the mail. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Two federal appellate courts have characterized the Brennan opinion as expressing the view of the Court, see Monteiro v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Two more similar cases came down in the 1830s, with State v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am by Ben Sperry
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Mark MacCarthy
California decision protected bookstores from publisher liability for selling obscene books. [read post]
Today, books, plays, and movies that Comstock would have condemned as obscene circulate freely. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
So I’m sure other US-based UGC services clear the 50M MAU threshold (Minecraft and Roblox are two likely examples). [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I happily dedicated my book Framed to both Mark and Jack Balkin, who also certainly qualifies as a member of my close, albeit non-biological, family. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
Likewise, I am furious at the recent Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the United States, however, constitutional adjudication does not work that way. [read post]