Search for: "United States v. Two Parcels of Property"
Results 1 - 20
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:43 pm
The developers proposed building stacked residential buildings on the parcels of land, which are contiguous, and are located within two separate zoning districts. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court in Murr v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
The Board noted that, consistent with the comprehensive plan, rezoning the subject property from a BTD to an HDRD would create a better transition between the two areas. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
The Board noted that, consistent with the comprehensive plan, rezoning the subject property from a BTD to an HDRD would create a better transition between the two areas. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
United States, ___ F.3d ___, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Bridge Aina Lea, LLC v State of Hawaii Land Use Commission, 2016 WL 797567 (D. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
Relevant to this case, PennEast sought to condemn two parcels in which New Jersey asserted a possessory interest, and 40 parcels in which the state claimed nonpossessory interests. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
They sued the United States in Federal Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:05 am
The case involved a parcel of real property with two buildings. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:24 am
Additionally, the Board considered materials submitted by the developers who intended to construct a 140–unit apartment complex on the subject property. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
It created a Planned Unit Development consisting of two parcels. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
The Fourth District suggested at some length that the “no set of circumstances test” was vague, difficult to apply, and that it wasn’t entirely clear that even the United States Supreme Court truly adhered to it anymore, citing Washington State Grange v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 12:58 pm
In United States of America v. 1.41 Acres, No. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
Section 66424 of the Act stated that property “shall be considered as contiguous units, even if it is separated by roads, streets, utility easement, or railroad rights-of-way. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:49 pm
Plaintiffs, Thelma and Richard Berry, owned two contiguous parcels of property known as Lot 2 of Block 15 and Lot 2 of Block 16 of Elmwood Subdivision, Section “D”, on Behrman Highway on the west bank of Jefferson Parish. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
There are also in the estate three other parcels of real estate which are now co-owned by the three brothers, which I will refer to as Wentworth Avenue, a property containing two units, a Yeo Street property containing eight units and a Mosman property containing two units. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 am
Dist., 570 U.S. 595 (2013), protections established under both the state and federal constitutions have been expanded to apply in the context of certain land use and zoning decisions requiring local government-imposed exactions or conditions to satisfy the following two (2) legal standards initially articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Nollan v. [read post]
