Search for: "United States v. Two Parcels of Property" Results 1 - 20 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
The developers proposed building stacked residential buildings on the parcels of land, which are contiguous, and are located within two separate zoning districts. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Board noted that, consistent with the comprehensive plan, rezoning the subject property from a BTD to an HDRD would create a better transition between the two areas. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Board noted that, consistent with the comprehensive plan, rezoning the subject property from a BTD to an HDRD would create a better transition between the two areas. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
Relevant to this case, PennEast sought to condemn two parcels in which New Jersey asserted a possessory interest, and 40 parcels in which the state claimed nonpossessory interests. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:51 am by Ilya Somin
Even when it comes to a single parcel, there is no good reason for concluding that a regulation that qualifies as a taking for a one acre parcel might cease to be one if the parcel were two acres instead. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:24 am by Patricia Salkin
Additionally, the Board considered materials submitted by the developers who intended to construct a 140–unit apartment complex on the subject property. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
  The Fourth District suggested at some length that the “no set of circumstances test” was vague, difficult to apply, and that it wasn’t entirely clear that even the United States Supreme Court truly adhered to it anymore, citing Washington State Grange v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by Patricia Salkin
Section 66424 of the Act stated that property “shall be considered as contiguous units, even if it is separated by roads, streets, utility easement, or railroad rights-of-way. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs, Thelma and Richard Berry, owned two contiguous parcels of property known as Lot 2 of Block 15 and Lot 2 of Block 16 of Elmwood Subdivision, Section “D”, on Behrman Highway on the west bank of Jefferson Parish. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
There are also in the estate three other parcels of real estate which are now co-owned by the three brothers, which I will refer to as Wentworth Avenue, a property containing two units, a Yeo Street property containing eight units and a Mosman property containing two units. [read post]