Search for: "United States v. US Foreign Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 1,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
Third, NSO has itself been sanctioned by the United States for supplying “spyware to foreign governments that used these tools to maliciously target government officials, journalists, businesspeople, activists, academics, and embassy workers. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:50 am
Apr. 17, 2013), the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the circuit split that arose following the 2010 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Court in January of 2010 rocked the nation when it decided Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Indeed, the term “person” was used to refer to a range of legal entities, including states, foreign states and corporations. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm by Amy Howe
For example, there is a presumption that U.S. law does not apply outside the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
United States, a case that raises the question whether the U.S. government can criminally prosecute corporations owned by foreign states. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm by Phillips & Cohen
Although both the United States and the United Kingdom are cracking down on corporate fraud and corruption, the U.K. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 2:57 pm by Christine Nielsen Czuprynski
Supreme Court held that a foreign corporation is not amenable to general jurisdiction merely because its affiliate, parent or subsidiary is subject to general jurisdiction in the forum state. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am by Guest Author
The MRT, roughly speaking, targets the accumulated earnings of certain foreign corporations, thereby reaching outside the United States, and so on this view the MRT cannot be a direct tax. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm by Ilya Somin
One of the standard arguments put forward by critics of the Supreme Court's decision protecting corporate political speech in Citizens United is that people aren't entitled to constitutional rights when they use corporate resources because corporations are "state-created entities. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am by John Buhl
GILTI is subject to a worldwide minimum tax of between 10.5 and 13.125 percent on an annual basis.[10] GILTI is supposed to reduce the incentive to shift corporate profits out of the United States by using intellectual property (IP). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
How ATS Parties Have Used Jesner The arguments made following Jesner in Doe v. [read post]