Search for: "United States v. Union Pacific R. Co." Results 81 - 92 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
(R&M) on alleged clean-air violations at the company’s chemical plant at 1019 Haverhill-Ohio Furnace Road, Haverhill, Ohio. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am by Fred Goldsmith
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 2009 WL 2731020 (E.D. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Dec. 30, 2008)Reversing dismissal of Black Manager's claims of discriminatory and retaliatory failure to promote and discriminatory and retaliatory pay disparity6th Circuit[Thanks to Sixth Circuit Cases]Clack v Rock-Tenn Co, No. (6th Cir. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
In a line of decisions, however, going back perhaps as far as Union Pacific R. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Carpenters Union Local No. 1109 v. [read post]