Search for: "United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
------- Title: Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
Some of the chemicals spilled onto B&B's 3.8-acre parcel and on a 0.9-acre adjacent parcel leased from Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. and Union Pacific Railroads Co. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
Union Pacific Railroad), but the Court does not question that they are persons in a legal sense. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:33 am
Facts/Discussion: In the early 1900's Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) conveyed real property located in Uinta County to Broadbent Land & Resources, LLC's (Broadbent) predecessors in interest, but reserved and excepted "all timber" on said lands. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
Regal-Beloit Corp.; Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
In Union Pacific Railroad Company v. 174 Acres of Land,7 the court noted that the railroad company could bring a diversity action against an owner so long as the railroad is properly authorized to condemn property within the State.Discovery Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 governs discovery in federal condemnation actions, as well as other federal matters. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  As of 2008, the Ports were served by 9 “on-dock” railyards, one “near dock” railyard (a Union Pacific facility 5 miles away), and 2 “off-dock” railyards (real party BNSF’s Hobart Yard and Union Pacific’s East Los Angeles Yard). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
The Committee’s secret meetings became public after a clerk’s journal was discovered.26Members of the committee offered draft constitutional amendments for an up or down vote.27Rather than citing the Bill of Rights, the first drafts mirrored language in the recently passed Civil Rights Act of 1866.28 Subsequent drafts spoke in terms of individual and equal rights, giving Congress the power to “make all laws necessary and proper to secure to all persons in every state… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
The Committee’s secret meetings became public after a clerk’s journal was discovered.26Members of the committee offered draft constitutional amendments for an up or down vote.27Rather than citing the Bill of Rights, the first drafts mirrored language in the recently passed Civil Rights Act of 1866.28 Subsequent drafts spoke in terms of individual and equal rights, giving Congress the power to “make all laws necessary and proper to secure to all persons in every state… [read post]