Search for: "United States v. Union Supply Co." Results 81 - 100 of 175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
The United States patent was granted on 7 July 1998. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  It is certainly helpful to be reminded of the debates going back to 1787 and continuing thereafter about the nature of the Union and of states within it. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
In the United States, silicosis litigation has been infused with fraud and deception, not by the defendants, but by the litigation industry that creates lawsuits. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am by PaulKostro
In re Farber, 78 N.J. 259, 270, cert. denied sub nom., New York Times Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
Harvie Wilkinson supplied one of the blurbs on the back cover of your book. [read post]