Search for: "United States v. Union Supply Co." Results 101 - 120 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm by Michael Grossman
It ranks 17th among the top 20 chemicals produced in the United States, according to the federal government. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In Avon State Bank, David Gibson, a man who purported to be the son of a business associate of Ambrose Herdering, a customer of Avon State Bank, sought out the assistance of Herdering in moving the estate of Gibson’s deceased father from the Netherlands to the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
With United Kingdom set to hold a referendum on continued British membership within the European Union, Prime Minister David Cameron has articulated a series of reforms that the U.K. would like to see enacted within the Union. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:46 am by Joy Waltemath
We cannot make such a determination” (Pacific Coast Supply, LLC dba Anderson Lumber Co. v NLRB, September 18, 2015, Garland, M.). [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Iraqi efforts will likely be helped by the four F-16 fighter jets that arrived in Baghdad from the United States this Monday. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
 In Couture, the Federal Circuit found § 1127 to be clear on its face, and reflective of long established case law, such as United Drug Co. v Theodore Rectanus, a 1918 Supreme Court case known by every U.S. trade mark law student. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]