Search for: "United States v. Union Supply Co." Results 121 - 140 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
 In Couture, the Federal Circuit found § 1127 to be clear on its face, and reflective of long established case law, such as United Drug Co. v Theodore Rectanus, a 1918 Supreme Court case known by every U.S. trade mark law student. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
” The Court denied cert. in June on a very similar issue involving California’s efforts to affect production beyond its borders in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University's School of Justice Studies. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:22 am by Docket Navigator
[defendant] knowingly supplies parts for televisions ultimately destined for the United States, the court finds no direct conduct, connection, or purposeful availment of Texas's laws that justifies the exercise of personal jurisdiction in Texas, as opposed to any other state in the union. [read post]