Search for: "United States v. Union Supply Co." Results 141 - 160 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
So what are the antitrust guides that employers should follow in the non-unionized economy? [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Whether C5 forms prior art because it was communicated to the opponent’s representative (recipient stage)[4.3] The parties admitted that there was a substantial level of co-operation between them and other professional representatives in order to create a test case. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
Federal Evidence Review takes a close look at Monday’s argument in Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
" (emphasis supplied)In the covering letter referred to above, the Claimant stated that by that letter, the negotiation period of six months as provided in Article 13.2 of the BIT commenced. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:52 am by Conor McEvily
Delia and United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Yet arguments of a conflict between copyright law and the First Amendment in the United States are relatively new — understanding why the two co-existed for nearly two centuries before these arguments began to appear should prove valuable to current scholarship. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm by Brad Pauley
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, S185544:  The question presented in this fully briefed case is whether two statutes designed to protect labor picketing activity, Code of Civil Procedure section 527.3 and Labor Code section 1138.1, violate constitutional free speech protections. [read post]