Search for: "United States v. Union Supply Co." Results 161 - 180 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
United Steel Union, 25 No. 19 Westlaw Journal Employment 4, Westlaw Journal Employment April 19, 2011The 3rd U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 This group includes individuals within the United States and many foreign countries. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Stakeholder reaction to emissions trading in the United States, the European Union, and the Netherlands. 25 J. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:43 am
In that decision, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist)     Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IAM)   United Kingdom Coexistence and the Omega saga: Omega Engineering Inc v Omega SA and others (IPKat) When picking a vaccum cleaner design, watch for the sucker punch... [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:21 am by Andrew Frisch
The federal court only recognizes a right to contribution under state law “in cases in which state law supplie[s] the appropriate rule of decision. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]