Search for: "United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
The court distinguished Hanover Shoe in its discussion of Midwestern Machinery Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
United Shoe Machinery Corp., which prohibited an indirect purchaser’s right to sue. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp. said you had to ignore that problem. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
United States, 370 U. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the Supreme Court rejected an offensive use of a pass on theory, in which indirect purchasers allege that they are injured because overcharges were passed on to them. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (where the defendant wasn’t very “international”), and World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that federal antitrust defendants generally may not assert a pass-on defense, because even a direct purchaser who passes on an overcharge, will likely be damaged in other ways by defendants’ violation of antitrust law. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]
24 May 2022, 8:31 am
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Adam Corp., 221 N.J. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]
