Search for: "United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co." Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
Furthermore, such a consequence is antagonistic to the bargain on which patent law is based wherein we ask inventors to give fulsome disclosure in exchange for a limited monopoly (British United Shoe Machinery Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am by Sean Wajert
At the end of the term, the Supreme Court decided two important personal jurisdiction cases, J.McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]