Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2007, 9:42 pm
Defendants have not yet answered Topline’s complaint or responded to the motion.The case cite is The Topline Corp. v. 4273371 Canada, Inc., No. 07-0938 (W.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:16 pm by Larry
Supreme Court in 1998 resulting in a decision called United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Sarah Friedman
OCF then brought its case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which ruled that OCF could register the color pink as a trademark in In re Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 774 F.2d 1116 (Fed. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Argentina that foreign nations are not “persons” is simply wrong, as is the Second Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in Frontera Resources Azerbaijan Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
  The court distinguished Hanover Shoe in its discussion of Midwestern Machinery Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
The Court reinforced it holding in Haslip again in 1993, when it decided TXO Production Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:01 pm by David Engstrom
When the government does not intervene, a relator like Hunt stands “in the shoes of the United States” and acts as an “official of the United States. [read post]