Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Sarah Friedman
OCF then brought its case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which ruled that OCF could register the color pink as a trademark in In re Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 774 F.2d 1116 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:16 pm by Larry
Supreme Court in 1998 resulting in a decision called United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm by llaird
MITE Corp., Justices disagreed about this position. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Argentina that foreign nations are not “persons” is simply wrong, as is the Second Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in Frontera Resources Azerbaijan Corp. v. [read post]