Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[ii] Nearly one out of every 11 United States publicly traded companies faced a securities lawsuit in 2019. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
And even if nobody raised that issue here because everyone believes it's more conservative to just stick to Aspen (a shoe that can fit, but doesn't fit like a glove), there will be other cases down the road, involving either Qualcomm or other SEP holders, such as that Continental v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm by Richa Srivastava
The Northern District of Illinois recently debated this in Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Review Board identified that, when looked at as a whole, the elements would be “combined in a distinctive manner indicating some ingenuity” (Atari Games Corp. v Oman, 888 F. 2d 878, D.C. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:01 pm by David Engstrom
When the government does not intervene, a relator like Hunt stands “in the shoes of the United States” and acts as an “official of the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
On October 14, 2014, Converse filed a complaint with the ITC alleging violations of section 337 by various respondents in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of shoes that infringe its trademark. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm by Nikki Siesel
 An example of this use is AMERICAN GIRL for shoes, see Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]