Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp."
Results 81 - 100
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 1:05 pm
They also expressed concerns that Texas already had the broadest pre-suit discovery mechanisms in the entire country, and referred to the United States Supreme Court’s comment in Chick Kam Choo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:15 pm
Procedural History"DataTern appeals from the [United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 10:55 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977). [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Shoe Corp.. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:13 am
In a 1927 decision called United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rendered judgment last year, overturning the district court’s finding that the red soles could not be trademarked. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
I am thinking about test cases because of Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court reinforced it holding in Haslip again in 1993, when it decided TXO Production Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:39 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Sunbeam Television Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Gray v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
The right to trial by jury is enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, in relevant part: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved…. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Bayer Corp., 131 S. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
Avdel Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
’s shoes. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:20 am
In that connection, I should note the Microsoft case (United States v. [read post]
