Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm by Larry
I am thinking about test cases because of Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
The Court reinforced it holding in Haslip again in 1993, when it decided TXO Production Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
In my post about Prenda Law's defamation lawsuits, I mentioned that Prenda is facing an inquiry by United States District Judge Otis Wright in Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:30 am by Jacob J. Payne
  The right to trial by jury is enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, in relevant part: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved…. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
  As well as sharing David Cameron’s text-speak (lol), Brooks provided the inquiry with an email sent to her by News Corp’s head of communications, Frederic Michel. [read post]
6 May 2012, 8:00 pm by Larry
For me, Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]