Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2012, 6:30 am by Jacob J. Payne
  The right to trial by jury is enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, in relevant part: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved…. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
  As well as sharing David Cameron’s text-speak (lol), Brooks provided the inquiry with an email sent to her by News Corp’s head of communications, Frederic Michel. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am by PaulKostro
Two fundamental principles are consistently applied in the personal jurisdiction cases decided by the United States Supreme Court under the federal Due Process Clause since International Shoe Company v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am by Ben Vernia
The Eleventh Circuit quickly disposed of Campbell’s argument that the award was not taxable because, as “assignee of the United States’ claim against Lockheed, he stands in the shoes of the government in receipt of a nontaxable recovery. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
 A ruling by the United States Supreme Court near the end of the savings and loan litigation, however, has reopened the door to these defenses. [read post]