Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp." Results 121 - 140 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Accession, Inc (Patently-O) CAFC: Jurisdiction in patent declaratory judgment actions: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Despatch Industries – In PV furnace case green patent litigation moves upstream (Green Patent Blog) Heathcote Holdings Corp – False marking Plaintiff’s chosen form not given deference: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Intel Corp., 157 F.3d 887, 896 (Fed. [read post]