Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp." Results 121 - 140 of 216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am by Ben Vernia
The Eleventh Circuit quickly disposed of Campbell’s argument that the award was not taxable because, as “assignee of the United States’ claim against Lockheed, he stands in the shoes of the government in receipt of a nontaxable recovery. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
 A ruling by the United States Supreme Court near the end of the savings and loan litigation, however, has reopened the door to these defenses. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Accession, Inc (Patently-O) CAFC: Jurisdiction in patent declaratory judgment actions: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Despatch Industries – In PV furnace case green patent litigation moves upstream (Green Patent Blog) Heathcote Holdings Corp – False marking Plaintiff’s chosen form not given deference: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Intel Corp., 157 F.3d 887, 896 (Fed. [read post]