Search for: "United States v. United States Shoe Corp."
Results 161 - 180
of 215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
BSN Medical Limited and BSN Medical GmbH (EPLAW) United States US General Year ahead: Range of IP policy issues may see action in United States in 2010 (IP Watch) Conan O’Brien wants to keep his IP (Daily Dose of IP) Invent Help sues patent blogger, Gene Quinn (The Invent Blog) US Patents Director Kappos on USPTO’s (lack of) funding (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IAM) When the examination process goes south (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:59 am
SHAPIRO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
In 1988, the Court went on to hold, in Business Electronics Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
Asics America Corp., Central Dist. of Calif. - USOC sued shoe seller for allegedly using “OLYMPICS” prominently in advertising its athletic shoes, including in the statement, “You Wear the Medals. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962), that the antitrust laws are designed to protect competition, not competitors). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:22 am
Kaplan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
Whirlpool Corp., 728 F.2d 1423, 1444 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
The court distinguished Hanover Shoe in its discussion of Midwestern Machinery Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Vergeer en Zonen before District Court of The Hague (Class 46) Poland Polish Patent Office partially invalidates VOGUE registration for Advance Magazine Publishers (Class 46) Poland, brands and billboards (Class 46) South America South American cooperation plan in IP rights (IP tango) Spain Spanish Ministry of Employment auctioning brand ‘Galerías Preciados’ (Class 46) Russia Interbrand’s ranking of Russia’s most valuable brands (IP finance)… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance)… [read post]
