Search for: "United States v. United States Steel Corp" Results 41 - 60 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am by Peter J. Dugan
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
Illinois State LawContract InterpretationFour Corners RuleParol Evidence RuleComparing the Subject Matter of ContractsAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:16-cv-03545Molon Motor and Coil Corporation (“Molon”) appeals from the judgment of the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
From 1986 until November 2006, U.S. law on the subject of non-market economies had been governed by a Court of Appeals decision, Georgetown Steel Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:23 pm by Lee Tankle
United States Steel Corp., Case No. 12-417 (Jan. 27, 2014), a case he described as requiring the Court to determine the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" under section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., Energy, Allied Indus. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
United States Steel Corp., in which the Court is considering what constitutes “changing clothes” for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
With all of these mines closed, and steel production no longer occurring in the United States, much of the state is trying to find ways to rebuild an economy that has still not recovered. [read post]