Search for: "United States v. Vance"
Results 141 - 160
of 328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 1:06 pm
Vance v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:13 am
And in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
China would be the third country to successfully land a rover on Mars, joining Russia and the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
Wickard v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
The Solicitor General has been invited to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases: Rubin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Vance. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
The Vance case merely raises the question whether anything about that precedent changes by virtue of the fact that here the subpoena comes from a state, rather than a federal, grand jury. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Vance. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
” It follows the Trump v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Cue the United States’ motion to reconsider in five, four, three . . . [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Chris Ford, assistant secretary of state for international security and nonproliferation at the State Department, on the future of arms control in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
The other case dealing with these issues is Vance v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:37 am
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jewish international law jurist who lived and taught law in the United States at the end of his life, is famous for coining the word “genocide”. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm
Last year, the January 6 committee requested certain documents from the Archivist of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:48 am
Vance, has its roots in a New York grand jury’s investigation of criminal violations of state law. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
