Search for: "United States v. Vance" Results 141 - 160 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
United States], in which the Supreme Court decided that the warrant-less seizure of the plaintiff’s cell phone records violated his Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
As he noted, “The President has not persuasively explained why, if executive privilege did not preclude enforcement of the subpoena issued in [United States v.] [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:09 am by Scott Bomboy
A three-panel federal appeals court has upheld a request from New York County’s District Attorney for President Donald Trump’s tax returns, likely sending the controversy to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
COA19-24 Filed: 1 October 2019 Vance County, No. 07 CRS 50717, 50725 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jewish international law jurist who lived and taught law in the United States at the end of his life, is famous for coining the word “genocide”. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm by Sarah Grant
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Matthew Kahn
United States, Maurer identified an argument that the parties, the amici, and the court did not make. [read post]