Search for: "United States v. Vergara" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2021, 11:30 am by Josh H. Escovedo
But a recent ruling from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York may cause some attorneys to rethink things. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
  Border Searches of Electronic Devices   The law is clear: the Supreme Court in 1977 in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm by Sophia Cope
” She wrote: [C]ell phones are ill suited to prevent the type of contraband that might be present on a cell phone from entering into the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
United States, 136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016) • M. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
Following trial, the district court found that Mexico was the state of the Children’s habitual residence, of the Convention, and that Fuentes had wrongfully retained the Children in the United States in violation of Vergara’s custody rights. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:30 am
This blog post will provide a brief overview of the legal status of embryos, as the answer varies throughout the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:00 am by Moderator
According to Ivan Vergara, director of air transport at the AAC, “Over the past several years we have signed [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]