Search for: "United States v. W. T. Grant Co." Results 1 - 20 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Aug. 28, 2015, Brann, J.), United States District Judge Matthew W. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
 The United States Supreme Court has held that certain categories of speech do not receive constitutional protection. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:31 am by Steven Cohen
 The third opinion involves Russell W. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted summary judgment that: (1) OWW was collaterally estopped from challenging the invalidity of claims 1, 2, 4, 15, 16, and 20 of the ’237 patent; (2) claims 18, 19, 21, 22, and 23 of the ’237 patent were invalid for obviousness; and (3) Alps failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to inequitable conduct. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
 In granting that motion, the United States District Court held:[T]he Court finds that the Policy unambiguously bars any and all suits commenced more than two years after the date of the damage or loss. [read post]