Search for: "United States v. Warner Bros. Pictures"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
It’s almost as if the folks over at Warner Bros. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
See Knute Rockne: All American (Warner Bros. 1940). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
THE US “REGISTRATION” REQUIREMENT IN COPYRIGHT LAW:The registration requirement is unique to the United States copyright enforcement and has been a topic of debate, in relation to its ambit, since long. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Zediva,4Warner Bros. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:08 pm
Warner Bros. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Warner Bros. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 12:34 pm
The case, DC Comics v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
” Warner Bros. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
As if the plaintiff roster in the two cases weren’t impressive enough, the amici dramatis personae is a Who’s Who of important institutions: the NBA, NFL, NHL, and MLB; Paramount Pictures, Warner Bros., the Directors Guild of America, SAG-AFTRA, the Writers Guild of America, MGM, et al.; ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, et al.; Ralph Oman, former Register of Copyrights of the United States—all in support of the plaintiffs-appellants—and entities… [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Among others, there’s the Betty Boop case (victory for AVELA) and the Wizard of Oz/Gone With the Wind case, Warner Bros. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
However, we appreciate the fact that radio broadcasting is stillin a chaotic and experimental state and that, while ultimately it will have to be placed on a commercial basis if it is to develop its potentialities, nevertheless the commercial side of the broadcasting problem has not yet been solved. [read post]
