Search for: "United States v. Watkins" Results 1 - 20 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), the Supreme Court of the United States considered prosecutorial immunity in the context of section 1983 actions. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, he heard about them at a meeting of an organization called Parents of New York United (P.O.N.Y.U.), a conservative group from Watkins Glen, in far-western New York, which had compiled a list of objectionable books and given it to the Long Island school-board members. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Chapa and Beth Watkins) that the general Texas judicial-proceedings privilege applies to the statute. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am by jonathanturley
Professor Andrew Bond denounced the United States as a “sh*t nation” and then invited conservatives to quote him. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
” The defendants ought to serve lengthy terms of incarceration because of their participation in a months-long conspiracy that aimed to oppose by force the authority of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day, O’Callaghan J made an order for costs in the case of Watkins v Tatana [2023] FCA 248, in favour of the Respondents. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 473 (1982). [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Post, The Courts on Climate Change and Fundamental Rights Arnon Gutfeld, Cantwell v. [read post]