Search for: "United States v. Watson" Results 21 - 40 of 571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
First up is the law of arrest, with the main cases being United States Watson (with notes on Gerstein and County of Riverside) on the cause and judicial review requirements, and Atwater v. [read post]
Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Apotex Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently granted defendant Apotex, Inc. [read post]
Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Apotex Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently granted defendant Apotex, Inc. [read post]
Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Apotex Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently granted defendant Apotex, Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
In response to this conundrum, American courts have oscillated between two judicial postures that the United States Supreme Court has found to be constitutionally permissible: (1) the “compulsory deference” method preferred in the 1871 case Watson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am by Chris Seaton
The United States records one million COVID deaths. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 11:31 am by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-402Issues: (1) Whether a “scheme or artifice to defraud” under the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am by Aaron Moss
A new crop of copyrighted works (including rights in a certain famous British detective) will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2023. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am by Justin Cole
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) asked Rosenbaum and Watson what exactly the United States is doing to support the International Criminal Court (ICC), posing it as a question for the record and ensuring the two witnesses understood the scope of his request for follow-up information. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]