Search for: "United States v. Watson" Results 81 - 100 of 571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2007, 2:22 am
United States, 06-6330 (per Booker, crack guidelines are advisory only; judge may consider crack/powder disparity in sentencing below the guidelines).United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am by Kristin Doyle
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) similarly requires consideration of secondary consideration evidence (MPEP 2145 (9th ed. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by Anna Christensen
United States and Bloate v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
” Judge Watson’s analysis reminds me of a colloquy in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by James Bickford
Robertson emphasizes that criminal contempt is, as the Court indicated in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 8:40 am
Three more quickies:In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Watson, The Decay of "Divers" and the Future of charging "Under Divers Occasions" in Light of United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Watson as improvidently granted. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm by Paul McGreal
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]