Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 341 - 360 of 28,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2025, 7:59 am by Jonathan Zasloff
Then the statute of limitations would be tolled. 2) This could constitute an “official act” under last year’s absurd precedent of Trump v United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 7:00 am by Edgar Chen
For well over a century, Congress, the courts, the executive branch, and the American public have understood and adhered to the principle set forth by the Court in 1898 that U.S. citizenship is automatically conferred to anyone born in the United States (except the children of diplomats and occupying foreign powers). [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 5:53 am by Jessie Arnell
The Congressional Review Act, which the REINS Act would amend, currently defines a “major rule” as a rule that would result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based… [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 5:49 am by Nema Milaninia
Rather than demonstrating a clear customary norm, the behavior of states suggests that head-of-state immunity remains a deeply embedded feature of international legal relations, or at minimum one where state practice is more fragmented vice widespread. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 4:01 am by Administrator
Edwards, the leading authority on the office of the Attorney Gen­eral in the United Kingdom and in the broader Commonwealth, was quite clear in his classic 1964 work The Law Officers of the Crown, and as recently as 1995 in a Canadian essay, that outside their prosecuto­rial decision-making, the Attorney General was and should be liable to professional discipline in the same way as any other lawyer.[10] Even Edwards, however, focused little on this professional accountability of the… [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:08 pm by Ilya Somin
The requirement that the "invasion" be conducted by a nation-state and against the United States' "territory" supports that the Congress was using "invasion" in the  military sense of the term  See Ex parte Bollman, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 75, 131 (1807) (describing levying war against the United States as "a military enterprize . . . against any of the territories of the United States");… [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm by Dr. Adam Feldman
United States (DDC March 18, 2025) Judge Ana Reyes (D. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Facts of the Case Under CWA, the EPA and authorized state agencies issue permits that impose requirements on entities that want to discharge “pollutants” into the waters of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A lawyer who threatened his former colleagues just found out.The case is United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs do not "even identify the most basic of statistics including, for example, the number of stun guns and/or tasers purchased in the United States for any given year. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 4:00 am by Unknown
If we change Barry's place of birth to outside the United States--and change nothing else, as the 'but for' test provides--well, he's still a citizen. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by Jeffrey S. Lubbers
This realization led the Administrative Conference of the United States to undertake a study that resulted in a 1969 recommendation urging the U.S. [read post]