Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 421 - 440 of 31,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
This serves as an incentive to health care providers and staff, as well as long term care facilities, to administer the updated vaccine. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiff brought derivative claims in an action filed in the United States District Court on behalf of the company for breach of fiduciary duty; aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; abuse of control; unjust enrichment; and violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
Data Subject Rights – Similar to other state privacy laws, the TDPSA includes five basic consumer rights: (i) Right to Access, (ii) Right to Correct, (iii) Right to Delete, (iv) Portability, and (v) Right to Opt Out (of targeted advertising, sale of personal data, and/or profiling). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:57 am by Ilya Somin
United States (2012), which established a multifactor balancing test for most flooding takings cases, in this article, published soon after the decision came down. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
On the other hand, countries are fighting to get their cultural property back to promote their own states’ national identities.[1] The disputed ownership of artifacts in western museums is a well-known global issue. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
It laid down the well-known categories of conduit, caching and hosting. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:44 pm by Tyler McBrien
On June 16, Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted a motion for a protective order limiting disclosure of discovery information, as well as the proposed protective order, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]