Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 541 - 560 of 31,745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”As for the purported travel restrictions, the AD1 agreed that it was up to the State Department (not the courts) to remove any restrictions on his passport, so that the father could return to the United States.Apparently, his arguments didn’t travel well, either.# # #DECISIONVelin M. v Bermet T. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2017, NYDFS was one of the first state financial regulators to impose cybersecurity requirements on covered entities. [read post]
United States, the court will consider whether the federal indictment against Capitol Riot defendant Joseph Fischer substantiates a charge under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am by jonathanturley
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm by Fred Chung
In United Therapeutics Corp. v Liquidia Tech Inc., the Federal Circuit reviewed the district court’s decision on invalidity and infringement of two pharmaceutical patents and the impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a parallel inter-partes review (IPR) upon the district court’s decision. [read post]