Search for: "United States v. Wells"
Results 61 - 80
of 30,924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
United States and Jackson v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
Phipps wrote that in Auld v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am
October 13, 2022 | Negotiating Prices with Drug Manufacturers | The Inflation Reduction Act aims to constrain rapidly increasing drug prices in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
Raich (2005) (Thomas, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
In our view, the phrase "Office . . . under the United States" refers to appointed positions in the Executive and Judicial Branches, as well as non-apex appointed positions in the Legislative Branch. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:00 am
A similar dynamic may be playing out in the United States after Roe’s overruling. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
In our view, the phrase “Office . . . under the United States” refers to appointed positions in the Executive and Judicial Branches, as well as non-apex appointed positions in the Legislative Branch. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
CSOEs are instruments of state power and political-economic objectives, as well as value maximizing market participants. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)? [read post]
12 May 2023, 9:21 am
The Board in GM said it would now apply its well-worn test, first set forth in Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:41 pm
Initial Hearing Procedure Master Robertson acting as application judge (Avli BRC Developments Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
§ 1702(a)(1)(B), extends to “any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:55 am
The United States Constitution protects Texans accused of crimes from being required to give any statement that could incriminate them. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:59 am
Apr. 28, 2023), on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
As Tocqueville observed long before Ken Paxton and his ilk blighted the federal courts, "[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:16 am
Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit works to protect Microsoft and its customers from digital threats. [read post]
