Search for: "United States v. Wells"
Results 61 - 80
of 31,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California just denied in part--and in economic terms, almost completely--a U.S. antitrust class action brought on behalf of leading French publishers such as Le Figaro and L'Équipe (about that one, see my personal note toward the end). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am
”Lea V., law professor emerita “I’m very grateful to Cornell LII and its tireless staff for providing free and up-to-date access to the United States Code and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence, plus its US Supreme Court advance sheets provided under its Hermes Project. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
In Virden v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
By the end of August 2021 DOD had evacuated over 120,000 people, which included not just SIV applicants but others at risk as well, 74,000 of which were housed on DOD installations in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 3:09 am
Unit Petroleum Company v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Project Background and Litigation History The Specific Plan covered 13 parcels comprising 797 acres, with a proposed development including up to 4,340 dwelling units with a maximum population increase of 15,928 new residents, as well as other uses including mixed use commercial, parks, open space, and schools. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:13 pm
Currently pending before the United States Supreme Court is the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
On Aug. 18, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in the long-running Marriott Data Breach MDL Litigation. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Hamlet Condominium Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
I then cited the provision of the United States Code that imposes an obligation to register for Selective Service only upon male citizens. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
That is stupid as well. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
The defendant was convicted and ultimately appealed his conviction to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
