Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 81 - 100 of 32,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm by Margaret Stock - Guest
  Arizona’s S.B. 1070 goes well beyond the traditional boundaries of Federal and State immigration cooperation – so much so, in fact, that the United States took the unusual tactic of suing to enjoin the law. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm by The Complex Litigator
The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Bench Trial by United Stated District Court Judge William Alsup (Northern District of California) in Gutierrez v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm by Bernadette Meyler
Instead, Thomas asserted, “at the time of the founding, it was well settled that States were immune under both the common law and the law of nations,” and that the states comprising the United States “retained these aspects of sovereignty” (587 U.S. ____, 9 [2019]). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm by Schachtman
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 8:00 pm by Jason Mazzone
The oral argument this past Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:13 pm by Zarine Kharazian
On December 13, 2017, the European Commission filed an amicus brief in the United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:13 pm by Zarine Kharazian
On December 13, 2017, the European Commission filed an amicus brief in the United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:38 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
It is well established that a judge "weighing in on witness credibility amounts to 'per se misconduct.'" United States v. [read post]