Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 121 - 140 of 31,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
Part IV – Abortion in popular politics This Part begins with an excellent comparative public policy study between France and the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:03 am by SHG
The court relied heavily on In re Hubbard, In Hubbard, the Eleventh Circuit relied heavily on United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
As to the latter, the panel ruled that failing to make a material disclosure required by Item 303 can serve as a predicate for a Section 10(b) claim, so long as the claim’s other elements are well pled. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
House of Representatives and the Senate already have determined that Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 “warrants … disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Gonzales , 435 F.3d 172 (2d Cir 2006) , and held that the one-year period in which a timely application for asylum may be made runs from the applicant’s literal “last arrival” even when that last arrival followed a relatively brief trip outside the United States pursuant to advance parole granted by immigration authorities (which the Second Circuit had held would not restart the one-year clock). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
With a near unanimous bench of judges from 15 and, in some cases, 16 different national legal systems, including the United States, the Court’s opinion spoke volumes. [read post]