Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 141 - 160 of 27,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Randolph J. May
So, the nondelegation doctrine is alive and well in the states. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:39 am by Kevin
The example in the headline, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Upon entry into force of this Treaty, the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain signed at London, December 22, 1931, will cease to have effect, with certain exceptions, between the United States and Malaysia. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 22, like the parallel provision of almost all recent United States extradition treaties, stipulates that the Treaty is retroactive, in the sense that it applies to offenses committed before as well as after its entry into force. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
United States: An Emerging Model for Domestic Violence & Human Rights Advocacy in the United States (Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol. 21, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
  The 2009 indictment states that from September of 2007 through August of 2009, Omar, a Somali citizen who is a lawful permanent resident of the United States, conspired with others to provide financial assistance as well as personnel to al-Shabaab. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:47 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
  Arizona’s licensing law falls well within the confines of the authority Congress chose to leave to the States and therefore is not expressly preempted. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1923. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]