Search for: "United States v. Wells Fargo" Results 1 - 20 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
9 May 2022, 7:24 am by Dan Farber
For example, as a former state pension overseer told NPR, “Let’s take Wells Fargo, for instance. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, e.g., United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Congress does actually attempt to legislate for the safety and well-being of U.S. citizens in their efforts to ensure we have safe food and pharmaceuticals, and trustworthy capital markets, among many ot [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:38 pm by Colin E. Flora
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., noted an important and easily overlooked aspect of federal appellate practice. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:47 pm by John Elwood
Wells Fargo & Co., 20-866, involving lawsuits against pension-fund fiduciaries; and two-time relist Ericsson Inc v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm by John Elwood
Wells Fargo & Co., 20-866Issues: (1) Whether, under Fifth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer, fiduciaries of an employee stock ownership fund are effectively immune from duty-of-prudence liability for the failure to publicly disclose inside information; and (2) whether Dudenhoeffer’s framework extends beyond prudence-based claims and applies to duty-of-loyalty claims against ESOP fiduciaries. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Utah Dep’t of Corr., 79 F.3d 1024, 1029–30 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. [read post]