Search for: "United States v. Wexler"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2008, 4:24 am
Wexler v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 10:49 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:25 pm
It is not often that the Second Circuit reverses a drug conspiracy on insufficiency grounds, but it did so in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
In fact, it tells us nothing.The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 10:17 am
Per Wexler v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
United States case, is a judicially crafted exemption to the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:06 am
District Court of the Eastern District of New York awarded interim attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $3,707,313.29 to Plaintiffs who intervened in the matter of United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
In Meyer v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
A variant on this argument is that trans individuals join the military only for gender-affirming care and will leave shortly after receiving operations, thus affecting unit cohesion and readiness. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In Haas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
On Huffington Post, Jay Wexler discusses the upcoming case Salazar v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
Wexler There are stunners and there are non-stunners. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:08 am
Wexler Amid the flurry of major U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:43 pm
Wexler In a scathing opinion issued today in EEOC v. [read post]
