Search for: "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In deciding whether preemption was the legally required outcome, the Court looked to and applied the landmark preemption analysis case White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:31 pm by NARF
S.3168/H.R.5880 - A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to modify the enforceability date for certain provisions, and for other purposes. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm by NARF
Arizona Department of Revenue (White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:08 am by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bills were added:S.2850: A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2020 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Wheeler (435US313) — Recognition of inherent tribal authority to prosecute Indians as a separate sovereign v. (18) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 11:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.html White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The majority then analyzed the state’s jurisdiction under the federal Indian law preemption analysis under White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bills were added: S.2850: A bill to amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2020 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
Video Gaming Technologies Inc., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Video Gaming Technologies Inc., 19-1298Issue: Whether a generally applicable state ad valorem tax, as assessed against personal property owned by a non-Indian, out-of-state corporate entity and leased to a tribe for use in its casino operations, is preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Supreme Court’s “particularized inquiry” balancing test from White Mountain Apache Tribe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
 Later in 1998, the Service approved the Mexican Wolf Interagency Management Plan (IMP), in cooperation with Arizona Game and Fish (AGFD), New Mexico Department of Fish and Game (NMFG), Forest Service (USFS), several counties, and the San Carlos and White Mountain Apache Tribes (WMAT). [read post]