Search for: "United States v. Wickersham"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
United States Post-Morrison, State Law Rather Than Federal Supports Claims By Non-U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Nearly a decade ago, the United States Supreme Court in Dura Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
The reenactments are possible due to the work of the Honorable Denny Chin, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and Kathy Hirata Chin, partner, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:04 pm
Here’s the press release: TradeComet.com LLC filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a complaint asserting Google violates antitrust laws by eliminating competition and choice. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Back in 2003 the United States Supreme Court set out to decide in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:22 pm
Schnitzer Steel Products, 189 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1999); United Kingdom v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Shroyer v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
United States, 510 U.S.540, 550 (1994) (Scalia, J.). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
Loree was a partner in the Litigation Department of New York City’s Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, the oldest continuous law partnership in the United States and one of the world’s leading financial service firms. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Introduction In Part IVA (here) we considered whether the question in Stolt-Nielsen was one for the court or the arbitrators to decide, and predicted that at least five Justices of the United States Supreme Court will hold that the court must decide it. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:12 am
Introduction In Part III (here) we examined the background of Stolt-Nielsen and identified four issues that the United States Supreme Court will likely confront when it decides the case. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
(emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Breyer is probably the only avowed true purposivist on the United States Supreme Court, although certain other members of the Court may be influenced by purposivism to at least some degree. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
During college, Stevens trained in cryptology and served as a codebreaker in the United States Navy from 1942 to 1945 during World War II. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
In March 2004 the arbitration panel ruled in favor of Hancock, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, confirmed the award a few months later. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:46 am
The OPR began an investigation in November of 2003 after the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Michigan referred allegations of prosecutorial misconduct against Assistant United States Attorney Richard Convertino -- former lead trial counsel in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
Evan Stewart, a partner at Zuckerman Spaeder and an adjunct law professor at Fordham Law School and Brooklyn Law School, writes that if a visitor were to ask how stands the current state of corporate criminal liability in the United States, an opaque "fine" might be an appropriate response. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:25 am
This despite the fact that the SOB is an American citizen arrested in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Another forum seeing an increase in use is the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
