Search for: "United States v. Willings & Francis"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Justice Myers in Sabey v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:13 pm
Nursing Home v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The answer lies in the case of Francis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
Francis' attempt to renege violates the express condition upon which I suspended the requirement that he surrender to the custody of the United States Marshal. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
One case was Masses Publishing Co v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
It seems that the Court is willing to compel states to spend money on religious organizations if they spend money for nearly any kind of benefit programs that reach the hands of private entities. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 1:46 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Hearing Granted on Suppression of Statements, Inventory Search of Seized, Illegally Parked Car
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:07 am
Francis Steinberg and Morton Rudberg. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Erskine's position was quoted by the defense in the 1806 case United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part I begins by placing the Administration’s proposal in context with the authority the Administration already claims under color of Article II of the Constitution of the United States as well as the 2001 AUMF directed at al Qaeda. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
