Search for: "United States v. Willis"
Results 101 - 120
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:57 am
” The Eleventh Circuit opinion of Childers v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:31 pm
Plaintiff Philpot later registered the photograph with the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:51 am
Tinker v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
The beginning of this month marked the 45th anniversary of Thurgood Marshall’s term as Associate Justice in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm
United States, Justice Stephen Breyer concluded that even if the prosecutors had given the defense attorneys evidence that would have been helpful to the men, the jurors likely would have reached the same result. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
The Eleventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:32 pm
United States, 321 F. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:38 am
CAC adoption, already pervasive in the UK market, skyrocketed in the United States after a concerted effort by the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
[State of Texas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:26 am
[3] Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the United States [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
[no application of exclusionary rule where officer acted in objectively reasonable reliance on statute later declared unconstitutional]; United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:21 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
