Search for: "United States v. Willis" Results 101 - 120 of 375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am by Steven Boutwell
A loophole in the drafting of last year’s legislation made its application (including the Commission’s service as the central collector for sales/use taxes on remote sales) contingent on the Supreme Court of the United States ruling the South Dakota sales tax law in Wayfair was constitutional. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:47 pm by Jim Walker
If you are inclined to voice your concerns to the Court, please write to her at the following address: Re:  United States of America v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
April 29, 2019). [2] Sawyer at *36. [3] Sawyer at *36 (quoting Willis v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Willis Van Devanter made perhaps the most famous statement of these powers in McGrain v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am by Michael Lowe
  According to the Supreme Court of the United States, it’s not entrapment:  it’s doing what’s necessary to catch a criminal. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:16 am by David Markus
  From the Miami Herald:One of South Florida’s most infamous cocaine cowboys — Willie Falcon — has been deported to the Dominican Republic after his bid to stay in the United States failed following his 20-year prison sentence on a drug-related money-laundering conviction.Falcon, 62, was deported earlier this month because he was a convicted felon without U.S. citizenship. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
  The RSIB states that the Louisiana Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers (the “Commission”) “will not seek to enforce any sales or use tax collection obligation on remote sellers based on United States Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Steven Boutwell
  The law expressly provides, however, that Act No. 5 “shall apply to all taxable periods beginning on or after the date of the final ruling of the United States Supreme Court in [South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]