Search for: "United States v. Windsor"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Over 90 percent of abortions in the United States occur in the first trimester of pregnancy (before 13 weeks). [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Most recently, in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Windsor [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:30 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Brady's first exposure to Supreme Court cases was reading ones with a direct impact on his life—especially United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:19 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:30 am
When presenting the court with the marriage equality cases, United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm
Texas was decided on June 26, 2003; United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
By repeatedly singling out polygamy as not protected by the Act, in some ways even more so than the Defense of Marriage Act singled out same-sex marriage for a lack of protection, the Respect for Marriage Act likely violates the Fifth Amendment under a United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
The part of DOMA denying federal recognition to same-sex marriages that were valid in the state the couple lived in was struck down as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
